billig Die Auswahl ist inzwischen sehr groß und so ist für jeden Anspruch etwas dabei Plastiktüte dass keine Versandkosten anfallen und das gewünschte Produkt sofort zur Verfügung steht Generell geht es darum, den Bestellprozess für den Kunden so angenehm und einfach wie möglich zu gestalten der für Onlineshops eine wesentliche Rolle spielt. CPC – Kosten pro Klick (Cost per Click) Verbraucher nutzen Das wird dann sinnvoll, wenn es auf Shops und Websites etwas neues gibt rat unprecedented an at grown has Iceland in paper Abstract:Tourism     Review/position        study Case         check): (please type Contribution mha@hi.is Asgeirsson, email):Magnus including (address details author Corresponding Iceland University, Reykjavik specialist, HR Gustavsdottir, Ester Iceland University, Bifrost professor, Assistant Thorsteinsson, IcelandBrynjar of University Graduate, MS Neshybová, IcelandPaulína of University Adjunct, Asgeirsson,  Magnus Iceland from case A - practices satisfaction and motivation Employee problems.   17. recruitment and shortage labour the from suffers sector The old. years 26 under are employees sector's the of cent per 30 present At 2025. by recruited be to needs employees 40.000 that estimated is it and century 21st the in doubled has Finland in tourism because issue, current is theme chapter's words:The 50 maximum - countries Nordic to connected study your see you how on statement brief 225-238. A (2): 25 Psychology, and Business of Journal Performance. and Relationships Organizational Millennials' on Perspective Communication A Workplace: the in Millennials 2010. Sdaghiani, & Organization.Myers and Management 139. Administration Business 339. Wasaensia, Acta work. at Y Generation understanding in perspectives different Adopting work!" at be to nice so "It's 2015. S. https://mara.fi/en/hospitality-industryKultalahti, 2019 MaRa, Association Hospitality 595-615.Finnish (6): 20 Management, Hospitality Contemporary of Journal management. International hospitality of study a values: work in differences Generational 2008. Y. Choi, & P-J. 131-139.Chen, (2): 16 Inquiry, Business of Journal The Factors. Motivating Workplace Glass: Looking The Through Millennials 2017. A. Patrick, & R. , 131-145.Calk 45(2): Administration, & Policy Social Crisis. Financial the During and Before Continuity and Change - Policies Employment Nordic 2011. S. Leadership References:Jochem, hospitality, and Tourism Millennials, Z, and Y (3-6):Generations Keywords successfully. workforce Z and Y manage and retain recruit, to supervisors sector's hospitality and tourism for drawn are Implications The Finland. Central the in companies hospitality and tourism medium-sized and small 5-10 to survey online an through 2019 spring the during collected be will data The workplaces. the in leadership and communities work work, their experience Z and Y generations the how explain and identify to aims study This countries. Nordic in especially rare still are questions these explore that studies empirical the Currently, 2017). Patrick, & (Calk work meaningful and challenging through actualization seek and belonging, for desire the and needs basic by motivated are workers Millennial that show studies Previous 2015). (Kultalahti, them for supervisor of role the and 2008), Choi, & (Chen values work in differences generational 2017), Patrick, & (Calk motivation workplace influencing factors 2010), Sdaghiani, & (Myers performance and relationships organizational Millennials' about forward put opinions of variety a been have There Z. Generation and Y Generation as known are nowadays force work the enter that employees the of majority a Specifically, workplaces. the in practices and paradigms management previous the challenging are and workforce hospitality and tourism the entering are employees of generations new the that means demographics Changing 2019). MaRa, Association Hospitality (Finnish old. years 26 under are employees sector's the of cent per 30 Today, problems. recruitment and shortage labour the from suffers sector hospitality and tourism the time, same the At 2025. by recruited be to needs employees new 40.000 and century 21st the in doubled has travellers foreign of amount the Finland, paper AbstractIn Empirical              check): (please type FINLANDmarianne.ekonen@jamk.fiContribution Jyväskylä, 40200 35, SciencesRajakatu Applied of University EkonenJAMK email):Marianne including (address details author SciencesCorresponding Applied of University JAMK Mirva, SciencesLeppälä, Applied of University JAMK Elina, SciencesVaara, Applied of University JAMK Hilkka, SciencesHeikkilä, Applied of University JAMK Anne, SciencesTörn-Laapio, Applied of University JAMK Marianne,  Ekonen, challenges and opportunities hospitality: and tourism in Z and Y Generations Employing countries  16. Nordic the in bargaining collective and unions of position strong the with clashing ideas neoliberal the on focuses analysis the of part and Iceland from studies Case words: 50 maximum - countries Nordic to connected study your see you how on statement brief A Iceland tourism, workers, migrant unions, Labour (3-6): Keywords 1-51. Limited, Publishing Group Emerald Bingley: 28. Research, Social Comparative Capitalism, of Varieties Nordic The (ed.) Mjøset L. In Collapse.' Financial and Neoliberalism to Statism From Capitalism: 'Icelandic 2011. Stefán Ólafsson, 3-25. 33(1), Research, Regional and Urban of Journal Intern. Sector. Service London´s Greater in Labour of Divisions Immigrant Emerging Migration: Economic and Work Precarious (2009). S. Dyer, & A. Batnitzky, L., McDowell, Routledge. York: New & London resorts. tourist and hotels in workers and work Organising World? Hospitable A (2015). A. Underthun, & D. Jordhus-Lier, 353-366. 14(4), Tourism, and Hospitality of Journal Scandinavian Agenda. Research and Framework a Towards Areas: Populated Sparsely in Mobilities and Tourism (2014). L. Lundmark & D.B. Carson D.A., Carson, 2015). Underthun, & Jordhus-Lier 2014, Lundmark, & Carson (Carson, prominent more been has resorts seasonal and cities big on research context Nordic the In tourism. in workers migrant on research of context geographic the into destinations, year whole into developing areas farming and towns smaller add we neoliberalism, and mobility of times in relations market labour on focusing from Apart tourism. responsible and sustainable on emphasis growing of part a as tourism, Icelandic in used system environmental and quality official the in issues labour on focus of lack of critique unions the is into deeper go will we themes the of One agreements. market labour to compliance and housing for employers on depending workers, migrant some of situation precarious the and situation new this with deal to structures governance coordinated of lack by experienced challences the are themes Among chapter. the of content main the is unions labour local at staff with interviews of analyses but industries, related tourism of structures the and tourism of sub-sectors different in employees of nationality the on statistics analyse We located. are attractions visited most the of many where region, South the other the and Lagoon Blue the and airport international Keflavik the around area the is One decade. last the in exponentially grown have numbers tourist where area, capital the outside Iceland, in regions two on study case our from findings analyse we chapter the In market. labour the in agreements collective in workers migrant international of inclusion unconditional demanding by 2011), (Ólafsson, 1990s the in Employers, of Federation the and government in both ideologies, neoliberal of influence rising resisted have traditions, model Nordic the of unions strong Iceland, In 2015). Underthun, & Jordhus-Lier 2009, Dyer, & Batnitzky (McDowell, tourism in workers migrant of organisation and conditions work on research of context the in Iceland in developments these analyse we chapter the In staff. unions labour of concern growing a is tourism in workers for agreements labour to compliance the Monitoring citizens. foreign now are members union of half nearly employment, tourism in growth fastest the experiencing areas In Iceland. in unions labour based geographically the for challenges new poses background cultural and socioeconomic diverse of workers temporary often and mobile highly of developments These citizens. foreign were employees the of quarter a 2017 in and doubled has tourism in employees of number the 2011 Since workforce. mobile intra-European of part being majority the workers, migrant international on relied increasingly has Iceland in industry tourism   The Abstract + study Case check): (please type Contribution irish@unak.is Íris, & mj@hi.is Magnfríður, email): including (address details author Corresponding Centre Research Tourism Icelandic Halldórsdóttir, H. Íris & Iceland, of University Júlíusdóttir,  Magnfríður neoliberalism with flirt and growth rapid of wake in Iceland in unions of Challenges - tourism in workers Migrant countries.15. Nordic the and Iceland in field this in experience work youth of knowledge improved to contribute will study This industry. the for group age this of importance significant the despite teenagers, on none and Iceland in sector tourism the in market labor the on exists research Limited Countries: Nordic the to connected study your see you how on statement brief A Iceland. sector, tourism girls, teenage employment, of terms satisfaction, Job Keywords: increases. conditions, working improved and rights their demand to courage and empowerment their experience, increased With time. right the at arrives payment negotiated the as long as instances first the in matter to seem don´t wages minimum and practices recruitment Poor job. the for training or instructions formal without pool the of end deep the into thrown were most recruited, When valued. is work their that experience and work their about proud feel girls the that revealed data interview the of Analysis Iceland. of context socio-economic the in tourism in in employment youth of meaning the (iii) satisfaction job their (iii) employment their of terms the (ii) sector tourism the in working towards perspectives their (i) discover to conducted were 17 to 16 of age the in girls with Interviews labor. for demand increased and decade last the sector the of expansion tremendous of face the in Iceland, in hospitality and tourism in employment their towards perspectives girl's teenage examines paper This 2018). Union, (Efling guesthouses and hotels cafes, restaurants, as such industry, service the within are in employed are girls teenage that jobs Common pyramid. force work the in down far position their in results market labor the in experience of lack Their Iceland. in system economic the maintaining in and sector tourism the for crucial are employees Young n.d.). Iceland, (Statistics documents official Icelandic in available not are groups age and gender on information whereas Iceland, in sector tourism the in worked people 27.000 2018, April In Iceland. in sector hospitality and tourism the in force work important an been years for have employers Young Abstract: paper. Empirical type: Contribution laufey@holar.is Iceland. College, University Hólar Tourism, Rural of Department of Head Haraldsdóttir, Laufey annavilborg@holar.is Iceland. College, University Hólar Tourism, Rural of Department professor, Assistant Einarsdóttir, Vilborg Anna authors: Corresponding Iceland. College, University Hólar Tourism, Rural of Department Haraldsdóttir. Laufey and Einarsdóttir Vilborg  Anna satisfaction. job and employment of Terms Iceland: in tourism in girls Teenage Cham.  14. Springer, Handbook. GlobalArctic The (eds) L. Heininen M., Finger In: Development. Arctic of Paradigms Contesting of Crossroads the at Tourism (2019) H. Strauss-Mazzullo S., 10.1080/15022250.2014.967998 Veijola DOI: 367-384, pp. 14(4), Tourism, and Hospitality of Journal Scandinavian Norway. Northern and Lapland Finnish in Workers Tourism Mobile of Attachment Place Tourists? Working or Residents Rural New (2014). B. Heimtun, & S. https://www.ndpculture.org/studies/mapping-exercise-how-could-creative-industries-foster-innovation-in-tourismin-the-northern-dimension-area Tuulentie, from Retrieved Culture. on Partnership Dimension Northern The Finland. ± Report Country area? Dimension Northern the in tourism in innovation foster industries creative could How exercise: Mapping (2016). L. Skarveli, & T. http://www.lappi.fi/c/document_library/get_file?folderId=53801&name=DLFE-33608.pdf Sandell, from: Retrieved suhdannekatsaus2018. Lapin (2018). liitto http://urn.f/URN:ISBN:978-952-263-566-2 Lapin from: Retrieved 2018:20. julkaisuja kulttuuriministeriön ja Helsinki:Opetus- 2025. vuoteen Näkymä kehitystä, alueiden osana kulttuuri ja Taide (2018). 10.1080/13683500.2014.894499OKM DOI: 350-360, pp. 18(4), Tourism, in Issues Current skills. job and motivations workers' destinations:seasonal Arctic in labours Foreign (2015). W. Wang, & S J.  References:Chen, travelers. for more highlighted and tourism to integrated be easily could which knowledge, tacit and heritage values, cultural carries it sustainability, increasing for potential has tourism Craft-based nature-based. mainly are services tourism where countries Nordic other with shared are challenges and possibilities similar but Finland, in made is research words: The 50 maximum - countries Nordic to connected study your see you how on statement brief souvenirs A sustainability, cultural employment, services, experience tourism, (3-6):craft-based it. Keywords in challenges the as well as artists for employment potential the of understanding better a create to interviews the with together analyzed be will workshops the from data The handicrafts. and design art, on based are which services, tourist new create to need concrete and potential is there interviews, the of analysis preliminary the on Based areas. creative and tourism from both actors, different with discussed be will topic this where workshops design service four organize will project the 2019, spring During tourists. for services craft-based adding of potential the and industry creative in tourism of state the research to Lapland Finnish in 2019 early - 2018 late in retailers design and DMO's tourism entrepreneurs, design and handicraft for interviews 15 conducted has (ESF) -project Lapland in of. Handmade thought been even not have that things - offer to much so have cultures Local countries. Nordic in visiting and staying living, of ways sustainable more and jobs year-around to lead would this situation, ideal In tourism. Nordic in authenticity and sustainability cultural increase and heritage cultural present can services experience craft-based and souvenirs crafted example, For improved. be could services tourism of quality the also but artists for rate employment the only not tourism, Nordic to elements these adding By 2016). Skarveli, & Sandell 2018, (OKM, industries creative and sector cultural the of help with increase can countries Nordic in tourism that expectations are  There services. the planning when box the of outside thinking and tourism culture-based for need a is there that shows This 2019). Strauss-Mazzullo, & Veijola i.e. (see Sámi the Europe, in culture indigenous only the including cultures local the of because also but nature, the of because only not countries Nordic visit tourists Nowadays, changing. be to seem interest their and tourists though even attention lacks sustainability cultural but change, climate of worries with together sustainability ecological of concerns also are There 2015). Wang, & Chen 2014, Heimtun, & Tuulentie (i.e. employees skilled of lack and workforce divided unevenly to lead can this and jobs seasonal only offering for criticized often is tourism However, remarkable. most is growth the Lapland, In 2018). liitto, (Lapin north the in live and work to wish who people for available are that jobs more mean can which grow, to tourists arriving of number the expecting are countries the all point, turning at is countries Nordic the in tourism paper Abstract The Empirical          check):x (please type RovaniemiFinlandouti.kugapi@ulapland.fi Contribution 896300 KugapiYliopistonkatu email): Outi including (address details author Finland Corresponding Lapland, of University Design, and Art of Faculty Laivamaa, FinlandLaura Lapland, of University Design, and Art of Faculty Huhmarniemi, FinlandMaria Lapland, of University Institute, Tourism Multidimensional Kugapi,  Outi North Nordic in service experience cultural and employment as handicrafts - tourism for treasure Potential   13. employment. and attractions of terms in another one from differ that regions distinct four as such features, unique has it However, countries. Nordic the of one is Finland Finland. in is article the of context the since countries, Nordic to connected firmly is article words:The 50 maximum - countries Nordic to connected study your see you how on statement brief employmentA organizations, public Finland, (3-6): Keywords industry. the in had have they impact the and issues employment the approached have project the within organized experiments the how describe We sector. tourism in faced challenges the for solutions find to Finland of Employment and Affairs Economic of Ministry The by funded project development core a is MatkailuDiili example. an as MatkailuDiili initiative employment tourism government's Finnish a to viewpoints explore we Second, challenges. structural larger as well as practical smaller many causing are which labor, skilled managing in challenges multidimensional the for reasons main the discuss we First, companies. tourism of management and recruitment as such practices, day every in realized is this how and Finland in instances public by governed is tourism how analyse we article, this In needed. are solutions complex equally and multidimensional are challenges the for reasons the However, growth. tourism the for obstacle an be cannot labor skilled of shortage the that stated has Finland in employment and affairs economic of Minister market. the in force labour available existing the match industry the in needed expertise existing of quality the nor amount the Neither market. the on positions open be might there while employees, skilled lack companies The employment. and labor concerning challenges along brought has it positive, is growth the 2018.)While employment and affairs economic of (Ministry 2025. by industry the to anticipated are jobs more 000 40 some and moment the workers 000 140 employees Tourism 2025. in percent three reach to expected is it and 2016 in GDP of percent 2,5 covered tourism government, Finnish the to According 2018). (OECD well. as employment tourism to implications has this and significant are tourism of impacts economic The Lapland. in especially strong, is growth tourism Finland, in Also 5%. approximately globally is moment the at rate growth The economy. world the in sectors growing fastest the of one is paperAbstractTourism Empirical X check): (please type anu.harju-myllyaho@lapinamk.fiContribution email): including (address details author SciencesCorresponding Applied of University Lapland Lecturer, M.Sci.(econ), Vähäkuopus, SciencesMari Applied of University Lapland Services, and Business in Responsibility Manager, Soc.Sci, M. Harju-Myllyaho, LaplandAnu of lecturer,University Senior PhD, Hakkarainen,  Maria perspective Finnish - Nordics the in Work Tourism of Governing   12. institutions. informal and formal Swedish with collaborating when challenges and opportunities both experiencing are entrepreneurs tourism migrant lifestyle these model, Nordic the Within general. in societies and landscapes Swedish of imaginaries their on based are Netherlands the from there move to motivations Their Sweden. in living are participants research words:The 50 maximum - countries Nordic to connected study your see you how on statement brief SwedenA entrepreneurs, tourism migrants, lifestyle interviews, (3-6):Downshifting, maintained?Keywords be systems pension and care health care, child as such services can how and model Nordic the for mean this does what tax, income less contribute and less work interviewees the If state. welfare Swedish the for downshifting of consequences on reflections presents then chapter The escapees. urban and self-employed the shifters, career backtrackers, plateauers, downshifters: of types 5 (1991) Saltzman's from departs discussion theoretical chapter's The 2005). (Schor income lower a to consumption of level the regulating by time leisure and work between balance the renegotiate did they Yet, migration. before managers or executives been had them of all not as downshifting, were entrepreneurs interviewed the degree what to discusses chapter The 2000). (Tan status and income lowered involving ways, alternative in living their earn to paths career rewarding financially of out opt voluntarily managers and executives professionals, where phenomenon contemporary a as described been has Downshifting downshifting. of concept the introduces chapter this migration, lifestyle intra-EU of studies these to addition In communities. receiving the in integration and consumption production, on perspectives with related often are studies The experiences. post-migration socio-economic as well as migrating for motivations economic than rather social examine studies such 2016), O'Reilly & (Benson migration lifestyle of context the In 2018). al. et Eimermann 2018, Kordel & Eimermann 2016, Eimermann (e.g. Värmland county Swedish the in working and living entrepreneurs tourism migrant lifestyle Dutch on studies in-depth qualitative from findings on builds chapter This studyAbstract Case         check): (please type Swedenmarco.eimermann@umu.se Contribution Umeå, University90187 Umeå Geography of email):Department including (address details author professor) Corresponding assistant (Research Sweden University, Umeå Eimermann,  Marco state. welfare Swedish the for consequences possible downshifting: of practices their and entrepreneurs tourism Dutch  11. countries. Nordic other in stakeholders and industry tourism the for implications presents also it industry, tourism Iceland's for important are findings study's the While countries. Nordic the of one Iceland, in managers hotel and employees hotel of study case a is study words:This 50 maximum - countries Nordic to connected study your see you how on statement brief sectorA hotel Iceland, workers, migrant labour, (3-6):Tourism Keywords stakeholders.   private and public as well as community academic the both for relevant is which Iceland, in industry tourism the in present dynamics the as well as workers migrant of experiences the into insights valuable provides study This hotel. Icelandic an in working of experience lived the and expectations the as well as industry tourism the in work up taking and Iceland to moving for motivations worker's on light sheds also It workforce. diverse culturally a managing from result to perceive managers hotel benefits and challenges what presents and industry tourism the in employment their from result to perceive workers migrant benefits and challenges what examines It managers. hotel and workers migrant with interviews qualitative on based sector, hotel Icelandic the in workers migrant about Iceland from study case a present will chapter This itself. industry tourism Icelandic the as well as employers employees, for challenges as well as benefits about brings workforce diverse a of composition labour new This 2016). Ferðamála, (Stjórnstöð industry tourism Icelandic the in employees all of 20% than more constitute workers migrant however, Today, immigration. by affected been barely had Iceland century, 21st the Until industry. tourism the in workers foreign in increase immense an seen has that country a of example an is Iceland 2015). Baum, 2013, Baum, & Scott Duncan, 2012, Joppe, 2011, Janta, 2007, Devine, & Hearns Baum, Devine, 2007, (Baum, diverse arguably are industry tourism the within work up take to workers migrant for motivations the and industry tourism the for benefits and challenges both about bring can workforce diversified industry's the that found been has It 2007). (Baum, countries Nordic including countries, many in workforce tourism local the of part substantial a form workers migrant Today, greatly. workforce its and industry tourism the affected has which work, and live to able are they where to regards with mobile increasingly are People 2016). Loftsdóttir, & (Skaptadóttir world today's of characteristic key a is Mobility study Abstract Case         check): (please type JóhannessonContribution Thór email):Gunnar including (address details author Iceland Corresponding of University Anthropology, of Department Professor, Skaptadóttir, Dís IcelandUnnur of University Tourism, and Geography of Department Professor, Jóhannesson, Thór IcelandGunnar of University Tourism, and Geography of Department student, MS Wendt,  Margrét industry tourism Icelandic the in workers Migrant discussed. 10. are context Norwegian/Nordic the in industry and training for implications policy and practical theoretical, contexts, conceptual and global broader within these locating After apprenticeship. during experiences employment youth and industry the in work about beliefs and perceptions youth's Norwegian on findings previous some presents chapter words:The 50 maximum - connection countries Nordic on statement brief experiencesA apprenticeship training, development, youth Employment, (3-6): Limited. Keywords Publisher Goodfellow Oxford: review. critical A hospitality: and tourism in employment Youth (2015). A. 2018:23.Walmsley, Report NIFU 2018), in companies federated NHO's among needs competence on survey a from Results inventory. competence (NHO's 2018. i medlemsbedrifter NHOs blant kompetansebehov om undersøkelse en fra Resultater 2018. Kompetansebarometer NHOs (2018). al., et T.C. Carlsten, & E. Solberg, P., Børing, K., 472-489.Rørstad, 62, Relations, Family families? for good entrepreneurship Is owners: business also are members family When (2013). A. James, & R. Breitkreuz, J., pp.1-12.Jennings, August, 5-8 Seoul, Management, Service in Symposium Research International 8th roles. service frontline and employment youth on perspective CSR A workforce: future the for caretakers the as organisations Service (2017). R.N.S. Robinson, & D. Solnet, M., Golubovskaya, 51-71. 7(4), studies, life working of ournal Nordic Tourism. and Hospitality in Pathway Educational of Choice Adolescents' Norwegian of Antecedents (2017) S.V. Einarsen, & R.J. Mykletun, Å.H.B., 460-481.Dagsland, 67(4), Training, & Education Vocational of Journal industry. hospitality Norwegian the in experiences apprentices' of study follow-up A future!" the actually are slaves-we not "We're (2015). S. Einarsen, & R.J. Mykletun, Å.H.B., 395-415.Dagsland, Tourism, 11(4), and Hospitality of Journal Industry. Scandinavian Hospitality the with Meeting their in Process Socialisation the in Experiences and Expectations Apprentices' (2011). S. Einarsen, & R. Mykletun, Å.H.B., DAMVAD. Dagsland, Oslo: Fishery) and Business of Ministry the for Paper White Business: Restaurant Norwegian (The fiskeridepartementet. og Nærings- For servicenæring. norsk om Utredning (2014). 1-22.DAMVAD 60, Research, Tourism of Annals Agenda. and Taxonomy Review, Research: Workforce Tourism (2016). D. Solnet, & R.N.S. Robinson, A., Kralj, T., 642-657.Baum, 42(6), Science, Marketing of Academy the of Journal performance. and behaviors, beliefs, employee service line front on communications brand of role The (2014). R. Mullins, & T. Meyer, A., Rapp, T., ReferencesBaker, contexts. Norwegian and Nordic the for implications practice and policy theoretical, consider to in back zoom then and contexts conceptual and global broader within narratives apprentice Norwegian these locate to out telescope first will findings, presenting after chapter, This youth. with 2017) al., et (Golubovskaya relationship symbiotic a even and 2013), al., et (Jennings responsibility care of duty and developmental a has 2007), Nickson, & Warhurst 2014, al. et Baker (cf. employment youth of benefits the on leveraging in industry, the suggest which literature, the to contributions Recent employees. competent recruiting of opportunity unique a miss may industry the thus - be' to 'professionals of instead labour' 'cheap as regarded be to experience apprentices the - opportunity an of instead burden a as apprenticeship experience to seems industry The conduct'. of 'codes and attitude of change a as such industry, the for challenges employment important underline findings These respect. and supervision, and training inclusion, alia inter of, lack a regarding experience further a report Apprentices met. not mainly are have they expectations positive prior the that showed 2015) 2011, et.al, (Dagsland data apprenticeship of analysis Prior industry. tourism and hospitality the in life working with encounters first youths' about general in much know not do We 2018). al., et (Rørstad workforce skilled of shortage of degree great/some report 61% workforce, competent a retaining and recruiting with difficulties facing is industry the and 2014) (DAMVAD, high are rates Turnover however. stay, not do suggest, trends They, %). 12 industries (other 24 of age the below is serving and accommodation in workforce the of 32% Norway In 2018). 2017, al., et (Dagsland, positive are industry this in work about, beliefs and of perceptions prior peoples' Young Norway. in experiences, employment youth regarding evidence previous on extend will chapter This industry. the in experiences and expectations encounters, first entrants' apprenticeship to pertaining dataset Norwegian a interrogates chapter this employment, youth hospitality and tourism vis-à-vis literature the to contributions recent with Engaging needs. business its fit to workforce new this train to as well as workforce competent and stable a secure and attract to industry the for possibilities the of one representing thus are systems apprenticeship Formal 2018). 2017, al., et Dagsland, (cf. apprenticeship of certificate a in resulting industry, the in apprentice an as years two by followed school secondary in classes foundation of years two with education, vocational through is industry the into pathways educational Norwegian the of One short. and furious fast, increasingly is experience employment youth tourism the that mounting is evidence international but 2015), Walmsley, 2016, al., et (Baum people young for life working into gateways are employment tourism and Hospitality employment'. tourism of attractiveness and 'image the and employment' 'youth between nexus Nordic the addresses chapter This youth  Norwegian of employer first a as hospitality and Tourism exit? early or lane, fast Gateway, paperAbstract Empirical              check): (please type  Contribution Norway  aase-helene.b.dagsland@uis.no - Stavanger ForusN-4036 8600 Pob Stavanger of ManagementUniversity Hotel of School Norwegian Dagsland Bakkevig Helene email):Åse including (address details author QueenslandCorresponding of University The School, Business UQ Robinson, N.S. Richard Stavanger of University Management, Hotel of School Norwegian Dagsland, Bakkevig Helene  Åse youth  Norwegian of employer first a as hospitality and Tourism exit? early or lane, fast Gateway, a 9.      is recruitment their that thereby and jobs, regular in employees replace illegally volunteers these that argued have participants market labor The country. the within working volunteers foreign i.e. countries), Nordic the of (one Iceland in debated much issue an treats study words:The 50 maximum - countries Nordic to connected study your see you how on statement brief market A labor exploitation, marketing, tourism, volunteers, (3-6):Iceland, position. Keywords market labor weak a in people young or voluntourists are they extent what to instance, for market, labor Icelandic the in volunteers of position the about knowledge the improve to important is it that conclude We enough. adaptable and hardworking not is who one recruiting than rather volunteer a without be to prefer they or volunteers, of supply in lack about unconcerned seemingly tone, rude occasionally straightforward, a in requirements their formulate to tend hosts The 2010). al. et (Hustinx concerns altruistic by guided individuals rather model' 'investment the and models' benefits 'private with line in behave who tourists are they assuming volunteers the to appeal mostly hosts the ads, the In 2018. and 2017 between increased volunteers for ads of number the recruitment, illegitimate about union labor the from warnings despite and hosts, the bother to seem not does it However, illegal. as work this defined organization employers' the and union labor Icelandic the that consequences the with hosts, the by required tasks all almost cover agreements labor Collective analyzed. were Iceland to volunteers for searching 2018 February 27 on and 2017 February 27 on HelpX and Workaway on appeared that ads online All low. is unemployment and expanded, rapidly has tourism where country high-income a Iceland, to volunteers of marketing the explore to  is chapter this of aim The writings. academic in used increasingly is voluntourism term the tourism, with combined When accommodation. and food for country home their outside working people, young to refers often most Volunteering globally. expanded has it though even area, researched under an is countries income high in words):Volunteering (250-400 paperAbstract Empirical              check): (please type je@hi.is Contribution 4360Email: +354-820 4508/mobile +354-525 work tel. Iceland Reykjavik, IS-101 v/Sæmundargötu Gimli Iceland of University Anthropology of Professor Einarsdóttir email):Jónína including (address details author  Corresponding Iceland of University Sociology, of Professor Rafnsdóttir, Linda IcelandGuðbjörg of University Anthropology, of Professor Einarsdóttir,  Jónína Iceland to voluntourists flexible and friendly of Marketing  8.      whole. a as market labour Swedish the for representative highly is data the Sweden, in areas metropolitan large the of exception the with Thus, Dalarna). and Västmanland Örebro, (Värmland, counties four the in living and/or working older) and age of years (16 individuals all for Sweden Statistics by hold registers administrative from compiled is database words:The 50 maximum - countries Nordic to connected study your see you how on statement brief SwedenA Central database, longitudinal mobility, market labour characteristics, (3-6):Workforce industry.Keywords hospitality and tourism the in mobility" of "culture a of possibility the and sectors, between differences cultural and institutional of perspective the from discussed are findings year).The certain a in to attached is individual the that workplace the of location the and income, related work workplace, of size workplace, the of classification (industrial information related life work and etc.), residence of place market, labour the to attachment attainment, educational composition, family birth, of country age, (sex, characteristics individual information: of range wide a contains database The mobility. of patterns different capture to and market, labour tourism the of features basic some present to used is population) the of % 10 approximately (representing Sweden central in counties four covering individuals on database longitudinal comprehensive A scales. different at mobility geographical and sectors, between workplaces, between mobility: of aspects different of perspective the from workforce and market labour hospitality and tourism Swedish the explores chapter sectors.This other most in than industry this in higher is mobility job-to-job and turnover staff that reasons the of some just are These weekends. and holidays during work part-time doing and payed low being training, specific without person female, often young, a is sector the in worker stereotyped The staff. temporary and contracts long-term on employed those between differences important create contracts employment Flexible industries. other to switch to or industry, the within jobs change to easy relatively is it and threshold entry low a have often industry hospitality and tourism the in available jobs of types the that means flexibility for need This market. labour the in flexibility of degree high a for calls and volatile, labour for demand the makes This demand. in fluctuations short-term other and variations seasonal by characterized is industry tourism and hospitality the in market labour The paperAbstract Empirical              check): (please type (mats.lundmark@oru.se) Contribution Lundmark Mats email): including (address details author  Corresponding Sweden in workforce hospitality and tourism The mobility? of culture A  7.      Model. Nordic the on migration of impact the discussing when arena central a constitutes thus and Sweden), (and Norway in immigrants of employers largest the of one is industry hospitality The 2016). (Grødem, immigrants among rates employment lower other amongst to due states, welfare Nordic the to challenges constitutes words:Migration 50 maximum - countries Nordic to connected study your see you how on statement brief integration A hospitality, migration, employment, (3-6):Tourism 172-183.Keywords 16(2), Research, Hospitality and Tourism UK. London, in workers hospitality migrant Hungarian of perspective A hosted: being while Hosting (2016). G. Michalkò, and A. Press.Irimiàs, University Stanford CA: Stanford, Bowlby. R. trans. Respond, to Derrida Jacques Invites Dufourmantelle Anne Hospitality: Of (2000). J. Press.Derrida, University Stanford CA: Stanford. Naas. M. and Brault P. trans. Levinas, Emmanuel to Adieu (1999). J. 1-38.Derrida, 26(6), Tourism, Sustainable of Journal omission? of sin serious a planning: and policy tourism in driver a as management resource human Sustainable T. (2018). ReferencesBaum, system. welfare comprehensive a for support public and life work in participation of degree high a on based is which model welfare Nordic the to challenges central present turn in may This isolation. and peripherality social to lead and roots, cultural and economic down putting of possibilities hinder may they because society, a in integration to barriers as contribute may that factors all are status low and conditions working Such 2018). (Baum, training occupational or competence language host education, formal little require that jobs in working rates, turnover labour high with contracts labour non-permanent on workers precarious and part-timers of percentage high a include workforce hospitality the of characteristics Key chains. international major of affiliates to economies gig and informal formal, the in micro-operations from scale in ranges that sector a also is It seasonality. and competition strong margins, low intensity, labour high to subject is industry hospitality The Sweden). (and Norway in industry hospitality the within workers migrant of processes integration these of experiences immigrant showing narratives 2-3 through explored and illustrated be will paradox The integration. to journey the during place take that host to guest from changes role the with engage and paradox this of complexity the understand to aspire we study, our In traditions. and myths stories, its through culture and place local representing one, day from hosts of one be will role their that expectation workplace a is there time, same the At customers. indeed, or, communities local colleagues, be may terms, cultural in who, hosts level, one at with, interact and guests as come workers migrant simply, culture.Put and representation stories, place, of overlays its with welcome, this of expectations in lies paradox The destination. and community a to (tourists) guests fellow welcomes that hospitality the deliver to asked widely are right, own their in guests much very still migrants, settled newly others, and 2000) (1999, Derrida of work the through us to Brought world. contemporary the in migration of paradoxes under-conceptualized the of one explore and discuss to aspires chapter This blurred. become guest and host between distinctions which at speed the and receive, not may or may they welcome the of form the in is hospitality This 2016). Michalkò, and (Irimiàs hospitality is locate families their and they which within community wider the and work into migrants new of integration the of heart the paperAbstractAt Theoretical          check): (please type Contribution tone.linge@uis.no Norway. Stavanger, N-4036 Stavanger, of University Management, Hotel of School Norwegian Linge, Therese email):Tone including (address details author Sweden Corresponding University, Scotland3Dalarna Strathclyde, of Norway2University Stavanger, of University Management, Hotel of School Duncan31Norwegian Tara & Baum2, Tom Furunes1, Trude Linge1, Therese  Tone industry hospitality the in employment through migrants to welcome a offering hospitableness: through Hospitality job  6.      leisure life, working oriented lifestyle worker, tourism workers, Seasonal (3-6):  Keywords 10.1386/hosp.1.1.25_1 DOI: . https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233579514_The_tourism_labour_conundrum_agenda_for_new_research_in_the_geography_of_hospitality_workers workers. hospitality of geography the in research new for agenda conundrum: labour tourism The (2011). D. Ioannides, & K. Zampoukos,  (16) https://login.bibproxy.kau.se:8443/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.D800FCF1&lang=sv&site=eds-live from Retrieved satisfaction. job and wellbeing workers' hospitality on employment seasonal of effects Self-reported winter: the for wait Can't (2018). A. Vukasovic,  (15) 1-8. 3(1), Research, Tourism of Journal International tourism. and work between interaction the across Variations tourists? working and workers Travelling (2001). N. Uriely,  (14) 659-666. 31(3), Management, Hospitality of Journal International Australia. Wales, South New of region Alpine the in operations hospitality and tourism on seasonality of impact The (2012). V. P. Gariddo, & I., Patterson, S., Pegg, (13) Karlstad. press: University Karlstad Skandinavia, Inre i globalisering och attraktivitet Interaktion,   - gränsen På (eds.) B Ericsson, A, Hauge, E, inOlsson, Folldal, I hundekjørere med illustrert - Skandinavia Indre til flytting utenlansk naturbasert og Fritids- (2012). K. Overvåg,  (12) https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2018.1497698 0029-1951. ISSN 00-00. 72, Vol. Geography of Journal Tidsskrift-Norwegian Geografisk Norsk context. Swedish-Norwegian a in commuting of study A integration: spatial and mobility for engine an as border The 2018. K. Overvåg, & B. Ericsson, E. Alfredsson-Olsson, C., Möller,  (11) 10.1080/15022250.2014.968365 DOI: 385-402, 14:4, Tourism and Hospitality of Journal Scandinavian Inmigrants? Potential - Resorts Ski Norwegian and Swedish in Workers Seasonal (2014). K. Overvåg, & B. Ericsson, C, Møller,  (10) 239-253. 1(4), Research, Tourism of Journal International life. of way a and occupation An jobs: hotel Seasonal (1999). D. Lee-Ross,  (9) 1135-1155. 38(3), Research, Tourism of Annals labor. tourism Exploring (2011). A. Ladkin,  (8) 41-67. 64(1): Retailing of Journal distribution. in gap technological the Bridging know-how: of flow International (1998). M. Kacker,  (7) 1006-1019. 32(5), Management, Tourism sector. hospitality UK the in workers migrant polish of experiences Employment (2011). P. Lugosi, & L., Brown, A., Ladkin, H., Janta,  (6) Bergen. Fagbokforlaget: reiselivskontekst. en i næringsutvikling og Innovasjon (eds) T Slåtten, & M. Rænningen, i innovasjonsarbeid, reiselivsbedriftenes i rolle sesongarabeidernes mobile De (2012). SE Hagen, & B Ericsson,  (5) Edinburgh. Conference, Process Labour International 27th debates. and issues of exploration An work: hospitality of mobilities The (2009). T. Baum, & D., Scott, T., Duncan,  (4) 594-608. 11(7), International, Development Career hotels. resort tourist and skiers of case The allies: are work and leisure When (2006). B. Boon,  (3) 107-137 3(2), Tourism, in Issues Current tourism. post-industrial of zones" "contact the Exploring tourist-workers: Migrant (2000). V. R. Bianchi,  (2) 31-58. 40(1), Quarterly, Sociological The workers. resort of mobility geographic The self: postmodern the and Transience (1999). P. Adler, & A., P. Adler, (1) References: (11). mushing regarding registered also is phenomenon This elusive. leisure and work between distinction the making lifestyle, "touristic" and mobile a in engaging for way and means a becomes work Thus, activities. leisure-oriented other and skiing for possibilities prioritise and emphasise they as tourism, in jobs taking for prominent become motives lifestyle-related workers", tourist seasonal "Migrant groups, the of one For 9). 1, (2, work seasonal in migration and mobility between intersections the illustrating discussed, are workers seasonal of "typologies" or groups Four work. for factors lifestyle-oriented as well as motives, place-related and social motives, economical include and diverse are workers seasonal for motives that show results Our resorts. ski in housekeeping/cleaning) in example for not (and restaurants and lifts ski ski-schools, in work seasonal on focus We (10). countries both for beneficial movements counter-cyclical and migration for motor a Sweden and Norway between border the made have which countries, these between unevenly developed have cycles economic years, later In Sweden. and Norway in resorts ski in workers seasonal of study a is chapter this for basis empirical The 14). 4, (2, lifestyle "pleasurable" a of part a work make thus and leisure, and work between limits blur may work tourism seasonal in engaging Employees destinations. tourist in appointments seasonal on take to salary, or work just than motives other have may workers seasonal migrant Thus, 8). 9, 6, 3, (1, world the around destinations tourism established in employment temporary with activities tourism and leisure combining of way a as motivated, lifestyle are jobs seasonal that shown have studies research Previous (5). destinations between triggers innovation as serve thereby and (7), flows" knowledge of "vehicles as recognized be could workers seasonal migrant that argue we Furthermore, life. in phase short a as work seasonal and motivation work resorts: ski in workers seasonal for important less conditions working unfavourable such making to contribute that factors main two discuss will We Sweden. and Norway in resorts ski in workers seasonal characterise also satisfaction work and status low such degree what to ask we chapter, this In 16). 15, (13, satisfaction work low and opportunities career limited times, working unfavourable income, (low conditions working unfavourable of suffer often they that and language, education, skills, professional of lack to due businesses, tourism in hierarchy job the in low placed as regarded often is tourism in workers seasonal   Migrant  Abstract paper Empirical check): (please type  Contribution be@ostforsk.no Norway, Elverum, NO-2418 400, P.O.Box Sciences, Applied of University Norway Inland Tourism, and Travel of Department Professor, Research Ericsson, Birgitta email): including (address details author Corresponding Sweden University, Karlstad Möller, Cecilia Norway Sciences, Applied of University Norway Inland Overvåg, Kjell Norway Sciences, Applied of University Norway Inland Institute/ Research Norway Eastern Ericsson,   Birgitta story? another - Norway and Sweden in resorts ski in workers seasonal Migrant  5.      sector. service Norwegian the is study the for context The study.  empirical an on reporting be will chapter words:The 50 maximum - countries Nordic to connected study your see you how on statement brief Norway. A sector, service logic, dominant service environment, work (3-6):Psychosocial Keywords sector.  service the in work at well-being and outcomes work individual and risks psychosocial between relationship the moderate practices logic dominant service that proposition a making by conclude We conflict. role high and differences cultural to due emerge Conflicts quality. service to expectations as well as market job the of fluctuations and developments technological to due change demands job quantitative and Qualitative sector. service of type and offering service of nature the on depending ways different in it perceive they control, job low have employees service most Although environment. work psychosocial the in hazards the minimize to enterprises the in applied are logic dominant service from stem that practices empirical that indicate findings our Moreover, data. the in logic dominant service of implementation empirical of examples found also We environment. work psychosocial their in hazards and risks potential as perceive employees service what in differences are there indicate data Our Results. NVIVO12. in analysis data conducted then We verbatim. them transcribed and interviews all recorded We services). supply and construction, cleaning, production, food hotel, from were (representatives environments service their in perceived risks psychosocial identify to enterprises fifteen from HSE-representatives eighteen with interviews group focus five conducted We Method: before. risks work psychosocial to relation in studied been not has it and 2004) Lusch, and (Vargo service-for-service-exchange as viewed be can exchanges all that idea the on based is logic dominant Service empirically. logic dominant service the to related are sector service Norwegian the in environment work psychosocial the in risks perceived how at look closer a take will we chapter, this In Aim: sector. service of factors specific context the and employees service of environment work psychosocial in risks perceived between interplay the explore to need a however, is, There economy. sharing new the through competition increasing an faces sector the addition, In sector. service the characterize diversity of levels high and levels, educational low work, precarious hours, working Irregular outcomes. organizational and employee negative as well as positive to linked been has environment work psychosocial of Components literature. the in attention increasing gained has environment work psychosocial The paperAbstract:Background: Empirical              check): (please type Norwayolga.gjerald@uis.no Contribution Stavanger, 4036 Stavanger, of University Management, Hotel of School Norwegian Gjerald, email):Olga including (address details author NorwayCorresponding Stavanger, of University Management, Hotel of School Norwegian from both Furunes, Trude & Gjerald  Olga firms service Norwegian in logic dominant service and environment work psychosocial Connecting  4.      tourism. of impacts economic the addresses which of latter the spaces, economic and organizational in emerge self-autonomy Sami to Challenges countries. Nordic within struggles autonomy cultural and political Sami review I Specifically, realms. social in present relations indigenous-state emphasizes Politics Indigenous and Studies Scandinavian in work words:My 50 maximum - countries Nordic to connected study your see you how on statement brief collaboration A colonialism, development, regional Sami, development, tourism tourism, (3-6):Indigenous futures. Keywords their for and states circumpolar across employment tourism inclusive and sustainable for need the reveals case Nordic The increases. tourism northern develop to urgency the interest, garners North the labelling. As of wary communities indigenous makes opportunities tourism limited and fallacies savage' 'noble of legacy A classification: Mindful employment. tourism to translate may employment co-management resource in Successes linkages: co-management/tourism prejudices.Develop economic and social dismantles activities tourism 'non-traditional' in individuals indigenous Employing dichotomies: traditional/developed Challenge ecosystems. and histories shared from draws learning Sami cross-border Additionally, Inuit. Canadian with sharing best-practice in engage Sami and Inuit Greenlandic relationships: learning transnational employment.Maintain tourism for obstacles legal removing for precedence set Act Finnmark the like Events laws: rights land  Monitor model: Nordic the within values cultural address considerations These equity. employment promote to development tourism for considerations five present I not).Finally, are Finland and Sweden while 169, ILO to party is (Norway standings legal national in variances and barriers political-economical by impacted is employment tourism Indigenous obstacles: difficulties.Legal communication to due employment tourism indigenous in growth challenge norms indigenous and Nordic norms: Inuit.Cultural and Maori the of those as such successes, international to look may populations Nordic communities, native to contribute may tourism how learn To livelihoods. traditional to disincentives and penalties economic in resulted assimilation and colonialism of legacy A tourism:  Extractive components: economic and political, historical, their and each of content rhetorical the address and studies, case and interviews from drawn archetypes' 'challenge three present I challenges. employment tourism community indigenous categorize I Second, tool. marketing a as culture treat tourism Northern southern-run overwhelmingly today's and persists, peoples indigenous of disregard The region. the into value' 'inserting by nation one's champion to region a as North the painted Amundsen and Nansen Explorers intrigue. and domination economic historical through defined perceptions, Nordic address first I response,  In marginalization? economical and political, social, of legacy the address communities do how Finally, perceptions? these of because face communities indigenous do challenges What industry? tourism the within employment indigenous affected North the of perceptions Nordic has How trends: marginalization these from emerge questions marginalization. Three of pattern troubling a continuing under-employed, and minimally are peoples indigenous tourism, Northern in growth exponential despite Today, inhabitants. indigenous of role the minimizing frontier, unexplored as North the viewed traditionally have explorers paper Abstract:Arctic Theoretical 651.468.7807 X               eahlness@uw.edu USA                        98155 WA Shoreline,             102 Unit St, 175th NE 1522 email):            including (address details author Washington Corresponding of University Ahlness,  Ellen States Nordic the in Employment Tourism Indigenous to Challenges Intersectional Past: the Battling   3.      state. welfare Nordic the of conceptualizations to respect with also significant societally are issues workforce Such organizations. public by sought workforces tourism of kind the to according documents policy and strategy tourism Nordic specifically examine words:We 50 maximum - countries Nordic to connected study your see you how on statement brief  A state welfare Nordic policy, tourism workforces, (3-6):Tourism  Keywords utilized. and motivated mobilized, reproduced, are workforces specific sector how of information of source expedient an regard this in offer documents policy tourism Official communities.  and societies of structure socio-economic the for implications important hold issues these because countries individual in trained are personnel how and sought are workers tourism of kind what generated, is labour of kind what at look to vital is it Therefore, policies. market labour various and education of provision the funding, through instance for supported, publicly often is development Tourism counties. Nordic the of regions many in sector tourism growing the to respect with also but 2018), (Baum, debates sustainability and policy tourism in underrepresented largely are which issues workforce into insights gaining in relevant only not is study Such states. welfare Nordic of contexts economic and socio-cultural wider the to relation in discussed then are findings research These analysis. the underpin workforce of nature constructed socially the highlighting studies, labour from Theorisations documents.  planning and policy plus strategies tourism national Swedish and Norwegian Finnish, of consist analysis discourse comparative and qualitative this for materials Empirical countries. Nordic in produced and after sought are workforces tourism of kind which exploring by gap this addresses chapter The 2016). al., et (Baum scarce fairly are relations labour tourism shaping issues structural uncover that examinations level macro while management and behaviour employee as such themes in focused work T&H of investigation the in perspectives level micro predominantly adopted has research tourism Yet, 2005). Wall, & (Liu markets job local from recruited is personnel when populations host for industries tourism expanding of effect beneficial most and direct most the usually is Employment globe. the over all development tourism promoting in (2014), UNWTO the as such organisations, transnational and governments national for argument dominating the is tourism of intensity labour The 2017). Group, Bank (World sector (T&H) hospitality and tourism the in employment to linked is people, million 292 of occupation the equalling worldwide, jobs ten of out one present, At systems. tourism functioning enabling in central is Work paper Abstract Empirical                cdb@du.se Sweden Falun/ 88 University791 BernardiDalarna De dorothee.bohn@gmail.com Cecilia Finland Rovaniemi/ 996900 BohnJoulutontunpolku email):Dorothee including (address details author  Corresponding Sweden Falun, University, Dalarna Studies, Business and Technology of School (CeTLeR), Research Leisure and Tourism for Centre Candidate, Doctoral Bernardi, De Cecilia Finland Rovaniemi, Lapland, of University (MTI), Institute Tourism Multidimensional Student, Degree Master Bohn,  Dorothee Documents Planning and Policy Tourism National of Study Exploratory An Tourism. Nordic for Workforces Forming state. 2.      welfare Nordic the of outcomes up-to-date relevant, the demystify to attempts and Sweden of areas peripheral and rural to specific matters and trends market labour tourism reveals study The words: 50 maximum - countries Nordic to connected study your see you how on statement brief A Countries Nordic Sweden, state, welfare tourism, mountain market, Labour (3-6): Keywords 2006). (Lundmark, size population eventual the to force labour the of contribution direct any and 2018) Müller, & (Åberg sector tourism the by employed those of backgrounds professional the as well as 2018) (Leu, peoples indigenous the and 2018) Karlsson, & Eimermann 2017, al., et (Hedlund migrants the as such groups significant certain include to order in study the of design the into integrated further is research art state-of-the case-specific Moreover, 2015). Tonin, & (Kolm state welfare Nordic typical a in market labour the to benefits non-wage as earmarked be will that revenues tax yield will employment overall as levels, wage the of regardless individuals, the to attractive is job any that evidence the on based related, are rates employment high and benefits state welfare positive how to given is attention Further employment. to significance uncertain, and uneven regionally yet overall, tourism's of terms in results the compare and century 21st the throughout area same the along force labour of mobility sectoral and intra-regional and inter- the mapping by intended are analyses follow-up study, this In variables. force labour on data micro georeferenced and longitudinal using region whole the analysed she when (2005), Lundmark by available made were findings these for Evidence populations. younger the especially attracts and needs that character labour-intensive, yet post-productivist, soft, its through region the for sector essential an become has tourism however, Concurrently, sectors. public the and primary the in jobs of number reduced and populations decreasing and ageing with decline rural of issue the to area central a been has range mountain Swedish the century, past the of decades two last the AbstractDuring study Case paper Empirical cenk.demiroglu@umu.se 87 901 Sweden, University, Umeå Geography, of Department Demiroglu, Cenk email): including (address details author Corresponding Sweden University, Umeå Geography, of Department Demiroglu, Cenk O. Sweden University, Umeå Geography, of Department Lundmark,  Linda Range Mountain Swedish the in Force Labour Tourism the to Revisit A  1.      Besucherverkehr Kassierer im Bereich der Logistik erfasst So lassen sich bequem mehrere Shops aus einem Backend verwalten Responsives Design

Verwirrt? Link zum original Text